## Environment
Overall, it's pretty good. The lobby is bright and comfortable, and the rooms are simple and stylish. If I had one suggestion, it would be that the entrance often gets congested with vehicles, making it difficult to accommodate too many dropping off guests, which is especially inconvenient during the rainy season.
## Accommodation
The bedding was comfortable, and the hygiene was acceptable, with no noticeable unpleasant foreign objects or stains. However, there was a faint, lingering smoke smell in the room, which was unpleasant for non-smokers and those who dislike smoking.
## Service
The service was excellent. The front desk staff, housekeeping, and concierge were all very friendly and attentive. I had specifically requested a non-smoking room in my booking notes, and a non-smoking room was assigned at check-in. Unfortunately, upon entering the room, I could still smell a strong cigarette odor. When I brought it up, the staff quickly arranged a room change. The second room, unlike the first, had the lights on and the AC already blasting, so when I first entered, I genuinely didn't smell smoke. However, once I felt too cold and turned down the fan and adjusted the AC, the smoke smell reappeared. Considering it was getting late and I had already changed rooms once, I decided to make do for the night and not bother the staff again. Regarding smoke control, perhaps even the hotel staff can't be sure if guests secretly smoke in the rooms. Whether it's strictly enforcing the 'no smoking' policy beforehand or ensuring thorough odor removal afterward, as a well-known hotel brand, I hope this issue can be improved. The hotel has both smoking and non-smoking rooms. Different types of guests pay the same price and have reasonable requests, yet they don't receive equal treatment. Why should non-smokers always have to compromise for smokers?
Original TextTranslation provided by AI