https://au.trip.com/travel-guide/attraction/vladivostok/memorial-to-pioneers-of-diving-in-the-pacific-ocean-56820436/
OverviewNearbyReviewsWin Prizes

Memorial to Pioneers of Diving in The Pacific Ocean

Памятный знак Пионерам подводного плавания на Тихом океане
󰺂1.0
No comments yet
based on 22 reviews
Monuments
Open year round, 24/7
Address:
Korabelnaya Embankment, 9, Vladivostok 690091 RussiaMap
What travelers say:

More

Explore near Memorial to Pioneers of Diving in The Pacific Ocean: Where to Stay, Eat, and Visit

Memorial to Pioneers of Diving in The Pacific Ocean Reviews: Insider Insights and Visitor Experiences

Write a Review
Trip.comTrip.com
TripAdvisor(22 Reviews)TripAdvisor
22 Reviews
  • Igor T
    Igor T
    ta-icon

    Memory

    Original Text

    It is good that there is such a monument in our city. The beginning of the development of submarine military navigation in our region. The first submarines themselves are heroes, bold on the pre-flood submarine, with ...

    Reviewed on Jun 18, 2018
  • P6304FOmarinag
    P6304FOmarinag
    ta-icon

    The first submarines of Vladivostok

    Original Text

    This historical sign is set in memory of the first submarines of Vladivostok. And the place is chosen very successful.

    Reviewed on Dec 28, 2016
  • Карина М
    Карина М
    ta-icon

    A great monument!

    Original Text

    Very important and necessary memorial sign for the sea city-monument of submarines, located across the road from the known submarine C-56. is on the ship's embankment.as far as I remember, after the utumn ...

    Reviewed on Feb 27, 2016
  • Den T
    Den T
    ta-icon

    Monument to the seafarers

    Original Text

    A small but no less valuable monument on the embankment, near the TF headquarters and the submarine-museum C-56.

    Reviewed on Feb 9, 2016
  • _S1890RX
    _S1890RX
    ta-icon

    abshybka!

    Original Text

    A good memory sign, but here in the inscription there was a mistake - the first submarines appeared in Vladivostok not in 1905, but in 1904 ... but it will no longer correct (((

    Reviewed on Oct 26, 2015
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3