Wilanów Palace Review

A very large palace building in the Soviet period, very essence and luxurious architectural design, this old building can also see some very distinctive design style, the palace itself is quite special.

Villanuv Palace, a particularly beautiful Polish palace, a bit of a reduced version of Versailles, very magnificent, especially suitable for taking pictures, baroque style, very elegant and quiet, highly recommended!

Villanov Palace is the summer palace of the Polish king, now the seat of the state guesthouse, located in the suburbs of the capital Warsaw, Villanov, is a group of chic, beautifully sculpted Buck-style construction groups. In 1802, a Gothic exhibition hall was built on the north side of the palace, with Chinese rooms and Chinese art collections.

Time to visit here, see the museum in Warsaw

A lovely palace that is tranquil and a joy to walk around. The surrounding grounds are very picturesque and the palace is accessible via public transport.

It was destroyed by war and rebuilt. It was a unique cave to visit. The small door was not very eye-catching. Many people only strolled outside. The ticket only cost 2 yuan. There were a lot of precious drawings and photos kept inside, and the history of reconstruction was rebuilt. From each small window, you can aim at the outside situation

The Villanuv Park is a garden surrounding the palace in the Villanuv Palace Museum. The iron gate into the garden reads quotation "Forget the troubles of life", which is admired by John III, who always believed that the room needed a beautiful view and a large number of decorative paintings, which was real life. The Villanueva Park is tree-lined, full of flowers and many sculptures. Most of the gardens are designed to highlight natural beauty and just rightly highlight charming creeks and lakes, as well as small architectural designs, Chinese pavilions and Roman bridges. Tickets for the park and the palace are bought separately.

Warsaw was built entirely, and was rebuilt after World War II. The old city was rebuilt according to the drawings of the past, so it retained the ancient style, while the new city was completely modern, and was built by the Soviet government at the time, so it more or less retained the style of the former Soviet Union. Personally, unlike the style of the ancient city of Rome, which is basically ruins, it is a complete new building, but the style is preserved, authentic, and historically significant. I think this may be one of the reasons why it can be selected for the World Heritage List.